Reasons for the failure will be presented, in the final section, in terms of Д°lker AytГјrk's model (see this issue), which proposes factors that may allow вЂ“ or may not lead to вЂ“ the implementation of romanisation. East Bengal, to (a) the Perso-Arabic script, and (b) the roman script.In all cases, the attempt to romanise any of the Indian scripts failed at the national вЂ“ official вЂ“ level, although Indian languages do have a conventional transliteration. The penultimate section deals with attempts to change the writing system in East Pakistan, i.e. The fourth section will look at the language/script policy of the Indian National Congress in pre-independence days, and attempts to introduce romanisation, especially the work of the Bengali linguist S. By way of background, an overview of the status of writing in the subcontinent will be presented in the second section, followed by a discussion of various earlier attempts in India to change writing systems, relating mainly to the situation in Bengal, which has one language and one script used by two large religious groups вЂ“ Muslims and Hindus (in modern-day Bangladesh and West Bengal, respectively). Key words: Bengali language, judgments in English, impact on the peopleDOI: 10.3329/dujl.v2i3.4143 The Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics: Vol.2 No.3 February, 2009 Page: 53-68ДЄbstractThis article will discuss two attempts at the romanisation of Indian languages in the twentieth century, one in pre-independence India and the second in Pakistan before the Bangladesh war of 1971. An attempt has been made in this article to assess the status and the enforceability of Bengali language with historical background, limitations of bringing into practice and some necessary measures for effective use of Bengali language in the courts. Language of courts should follow the language of the common people. Often delivering of judgments in English creates various problems for poor and illiterate person. In spite of these provisions, English is still used in the judicial system (Higher Courts) in Bangladesh. Moreover Bangla Bhasha Procholon Ain (Bengali Language Implementation Act) was made in 1987 for ensuring compulsory use of Bengali in courts and offices of Bangladesh. Bengali is our mother tongue and we have achieved this at the cost of much blood. Therefore, such cultural difference eventually develops a distinct linguistic identity of Bengali through untranslatability that this study has attempted to divulge.Д«engali language has been declared as the state language of the Republic in Article 3 of the Constitution of Bangladesh.

This study has argued in favor of the untranslatable base of Bengali that English, due to cultural distance, cannot embrace linguistically. Inability of other languages to penetrate such culture-rooted belongings of Bengali language showcases the power a language retains to protect itself from any invading force. The primary resource includes a lot many culture-oriented vocabularies as well as few phrases that English, as a language, cannot accommodate in it. In this study, a short story collection from Bangladesh, Matijaner Meyera, where there is a celebration of diverse branches of Bengali language, has been brought to light to show how untranslatability of a number of culture-oriented vocabularies vibrantly tells about Bengali culture. Therefore, translatable elements of language get the stage of universality while the untranslatable-s essentially bring forth the culture they are descended from. However, translation poses a challenge to the identity language predominantly constructs.

The concepts of language and cultural identity of a speaker are entwined as they complement each other.

Russian publication bengali books